HOME | ACTION PLAN | EDUCATION PLANNING | NUTRITION IN GUATEMALA | STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS | PROPOSED NEEDSSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE | COLD CLIMATE FRUIT TREES | STRAWBERRY PRODUCTION | PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS

Stakeholders Analysis

Stakeholder
Groups
Interests at Stake in relation to project
Effect of project on interests
-O+
Stakeholder
importance for project success: U,1,2,3,4,5
Degree of influence of stakeholder: U,1,2,3,4,5
San Pablo Parents
Improved health of children
?
5
5
Nutrition Education
+
Community Togetherness
?
San Pablo Children
Improved Health
?

5
3
Decreased dental caries?
?
Decreased DMII?
?
Nutrition Education
+

San Pablo Farmers



New Crops
+/-
5
5
Revenue
+
Increased knowledge of ag practices
+
Entire Community
Revenue
+
3
5
Community Business/Jobs
+
Decreased Health costs
+
Save $ on food
+
Community togetherness
?

Las Mujeres



Improved Health of Children
?
5
5
Increased Fruit Consumption
+
Time with children
?
Women’s equality – shift in gender roles
?

Community Greenhouse Participants


Expand Greenhouse
+
5
3
Add educational programs
+
Increased awareness of ag practices
+
Our Group
Cultural Awareness
+
3

2
Practical application of knowledge in our various fields
+
Good Grade
+












StageinProject
Process
Type of Participation

Communication
(1 wayflow)
Consultation
(2 wayflow)
Collaboration (increasingcontrolover decisionmaking)
Empowerment
(controltransferfor decisionsand resources)

Identification

LM, CG, SPP, SPF
LM, CG, SPP, SPF
LM, CG, SPP, SPF

Stakeholder
Influence
Importance of Stakeholder for success of project

Unknown
None 1
2
3
4
Great 5
Preparationand
Appraisal

LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC
LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC
LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC

Unknown







Implementation

LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC
LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC
LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC

None1












2



Our Group




Supervision and
Monitoring

LM, CG, SPP, SPF
LM, CG, SPP, SPF
LM, CG, SPP, SPF

3





SPC, CGP

4






Evaluation

All
All
LM, CG, SPP, SPF

Great5



EC


SPP, SPF, LM